Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. These are live readings of the discussion, never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Alex Rubinsteyn ×

Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 2 posts · 4d ago

Alex Rubinsteyn Singularity's Bounty e/cc

Alex Rubinsteyn: I tried Claude Code early 2025, dangerous slop. Tried again in December 2025 - much much better! By January 2026 had stopped manually coding. It’s only been a little over half a year for me but fee…

Singularity's Bounty e/cc: My first commit for my coding harness that assembled bits of code for context engineering to was 2023-04-02, so I waited about 4 months from the GPT 3.5 release before getting serious about AI coding

Open the thread →

2 experts · 3 posts · 19d ago

Ethan Mollick Alex Rubinsteyn

Ethan Mollick: I can basically guarantee you are not being ambitious enough with the work you are assigning Fable Start asking for the maximum possible thing to figure out the far edges of what it can do. After t…

Ethan Mollick: (This isn't some sort of boosterish AI slop post, I really think the right way to use Fable is to start by asking for everything and find the shape of the frontier from there, rather than starting …

Open the thread →