Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by alsweigart.bsky.social ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 17d ago

ChatGPT 5 Can't Count

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 0 communities 1 sources clustered
alsweigart.bsky.social

“I wrote up a blog post. These days, LLMs send that to a tool, because generating tokens from the model only gives numbers that *look like* a solution. Here's the thing: they still can't count, because even generating text for the tool is lossy. inventwithpy…”

Primary source inventwithpython.com ↗