Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,373 searchable experts 3,304 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Building & implementation Concern & critique Research & technical analysis
1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Live tension Incident Report: unsanctioned agent behaviour during cyber testing | AISI Work Concern & critique · 10 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Andrew Curran ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Accelerating Models & releases Resource 13h ago
⚡ 4 h early
Anthropic Claude math capabilities Lean release

Learning more about Claude's mathematical capabilities

4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Tim Kellogg
“Claude wasn’t able to solve the Riemann Hypothesis (yet) www.anthropic.com/research/rie...” evidence ↗
4 experts 2 communities 2 sources clustered
Thomas Steinke Tim Kellogg Deedy Das Andrew Curran

“Claude wasn’t able to solve the Riemann Hypothesis (yet) www.anthropic.com/research/rie...”

Primary source anthropic.com ↗ github.com ↗
Developing Agents & robotics Development 2d ago
⚡ 4 h early
AISI unsanctioned AI agent cyber incident

Incident Report: unsanctioned agent behaviour during cyber testing | AISI Work

18 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Mark Riedl, René Walter
“In 3rd party testing by AISI, Mythos attempted to insert malicious code into an open source project to pass a cyber evaluation test. It created a fake identity and attempted to pressure the code maintainer to accept the code update www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/inci…” evidence ↗
18 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Mark Riedl Ethan Mollick Yoshua Bengio Catherine Breslin Suresh Venkatasubramanian Eryk Salvaggio Eli Sennesh rat king 🐀 👑 +10
How the network is reacting The reaction spans practical upside and material concerns.
Live tension

Concern & critique

4 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“Fascinating: more examples of agents attempting to breach sandboxes. www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/inciden...”

Building & implementation

4 experts

How teams are shipping and applying it.

“Yes, the AIs were given a cybersecurity challenge, with internet access enabled and safety filters disabled But the extent to which Mythos 5 pursued its mission (fake identities, social engineering, inserting malicious code into a real open-source project) …”

Research & technical analysis

2 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“In 3rd party testing by AISI, Mythos attempted to insert malicious code into an open source project to pass a cyber evaluation test. It created a fake identity and attempted to pressure the code maintainer to accept the code update www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/inci…”

2 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Mark Riedl: In 3rd party testing by AISI, Mythos attempted to insert malicious code into an open source project to pass a cyber evaluation test. It created a fake identity and attempted to pressure the code ma…
Mark Riedl: Mythos was intentionally given email access and its cybersecurity guardrails were intentionally disabled. AISI detected the issue within an hour and shut down the experiment. No damage was done.
Mark Riedl: One take-away is that, unlike what we have seen from Anthropic and OpenAI, close monitoring and response is possible in a timely manner during these experiments.
Open the full discussion →
Primary source aisi.gov.uk ↗