Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis
2 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Reaction converging Fair Moderation, Equitable Access, and AI: arXiv’s Updated Rate Limit Policy Research & technical analysis · 5 attributable reactions Shared emphasis Ai generates findings authorship and disclosure rules draw fresh scrutiny Research & technical analysis · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Ben Williamson ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Policy & governance Development 12d ago
⚡ 4 h early
arXiv updates AI rate limit policy

Fair Moderation, Equitable Access, and AI: arXiv’s Updated Rate Limit Policy

12 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 5 attributable expert contributions · Thomas Dietterich, Clément Canonne, Olivia Guest
“Corrected link: blog.arxiv.org/2026/10/01/u...” evidence ↗
12 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
Thomas Dietterich Clément Canonne Ramon Astudillo Olivia Guest Pierre Alquier Ben Williamson Jason Moore Abdoulaye Diack +4
How the network is reacting 5 experts are independently emphasizing research & technical analysis.
Reaction converging

Research & technical analysis

5 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Fair Moderation, Equitable Access, and AI: arXiv’s Updated Rate Limit Policy blog.arxiv.org/2026/10/01/u... #arxiv #preprint #llms #chatbots #ai #publishing #research #science”

3 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Clément Canonne: "We want to encourage authors to be mindful with their work, taking care that they are submitting something substantial of scholarly interest that meets arXiv's guidelines and standards." 2 submiss…
David Picard: Oh, so you just have to let your 5 postdocs and 17 PhD students submit the work of your 35 undergrads to be off the hook and keep your 80+ papers per year? Good to know!
Lana Sinapayen: Pretty sure this is targeting single authors with 12 LLM generated pdfs, not big labs that legitimately can produce more than 2 papers a month.
Open the full discussion →
Primary source blog.arxiv.org ↗
Established Culture, work & education Development 9d ago
AI education meta-analyses audit finds flaws

39 meta-analyses, 39 positive findings: An audit finds serious flaws in research on AI in education

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Ben Williamson
“The research record on AI in education is already pretty appalling. And researchers just keep cranking up AI to do yet more meta-reviews that then recycle the findings of sloppy studies like this one. hechingerreport.org/proof-points...” evidence ↗
4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Mar Hicks Hypervisible Luke Stark Ben Williamson

“The research record on AI in education is already pretty appalling. And researchers just keep cranking up AI to do yet more meta-reviews that then recycle the findings of sloppy studies like this one. hechingerreport.org/proof-points...”

Primary source hechingerreport.org ↗
Established AI field signal Signal 8d ago

Ai generates findings authorship and disclosure rules draw fresh scrutiny

3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Scott McGrath, Jason Moore
“Who wrote that paper? AI use spurs debate over scientific authorship www.science.org/content/arti...” evidence ↗
3 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Scott McGrath Ben Williamson Jason Moore
Primary source science.org ↗
Established AI research Research 11d ago
⚡ 5 h early
AI-generated language comprehension paper

Why is AI-generated language so hard to understand?

3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Ben Williamson
“Maybe this explains why AI use disclosures on journal manuscripts claiming an LLM was used for "editing and language improvement only" usually function as warnings that 8000 words of unintelligible text are to follow arxiv.org/abs/2610.291...” evidence ↗
3 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
James Grimmelmann Ben Williamson Jake Browning

“Maybe this explains why AI use disclosures on journal manuscripts claiming an LLM was used for "editing and language improvement only" usually function as warnings that 8000 words of unintelligible text are to follow arxiv.org/abs/2610.291...”

Primary source arxiv.org ↗
Established Culture, work & education Analysis 11d ago
AI education evidence production critique

The problem with evidence production on AI in education | code acts in education

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Ben Williamson
“So bad are the meta-reviews of existing bad AIED research that there is now a whole genre of meta-meta-reviews of how bad AIED research is. AI in education has a *serious* research and evidence problem. And it shows few signs of being resolved. codeactsined…” evidence ↗
2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Ben Williamson Social Media Lab

“So bad are the meta-reviews of existing bad AIED research that there is now a whole genre of meta-meta-reviews of how bad AIED research is. AI in education has a *serious* research and evidence problem. And it shows few signs of being resolved. codeactsined…”

Primary source codeactsineducation.wordpress.com ↗
Established Culture, work & education Analysis 19d ago
⚡ 123 h early
GenAI organised irresponsibility essay

View of Implications and Inferences: On the Organised Irresponsibility of Generative Artificial Intelligence

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Jack Stilgoe
“A new paper from me, on organised irresponsibility in AI estsjournal.org/index.php/es...” evidence ↗
2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Jack Stilgoe Ben Williamson

“A new paper from me, on organised irresponsibility in AI estsjournal.org/index.php/es...”

2 experts discussed this · 8 posts
Jack Stilgoe: A new paper from me, on organised irresponsibility in AI estsjournal.org/index.php/es...
Jack Stilgoe: Often, it is assumed that we social scientists are interested in the IMPLICATIONS of technology. I think instead we should look at the INFERENCES of technology - not what it implies for society, bu…
Jack Stilgoe: But here's Ben Affleck for the science bit
Open the full discussion →
Primary source estsjournal.org ↗
Established AI research Development 10d ago
EEF seeks AI edtech evaluator researchers

EEF seeks researchers to evaluate AI and edtech tools | ETIH EdTech News — EdTech Innovation Hub

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Ben Williamson
“"The EdTech Testbed Programme will run from 2026 to 2030... The first stage, led by a research consortium headed by Ipsos, will involve up to 75 rapid evaluations of education technology products." That's a lot of live edtech and AIed testing in schools www…” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Ben Williamson

“"The EdTech Testbed Programme will run from 2026 to 2030... The first stage, led by a research consortium headed by Ipsos, will involve up to 75 rapid evaluations of education technology products." That's a lot of live edtech and AIed testing in schools www…”

Primary source edtechinnovationhub.com ↗