Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources

Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Who is contributing? How are they reacting?

Topic Search developments Clear all

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Ben Winters ×

Most important

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 12d ago

⚡ 1024 h early

7 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

7 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered

“this may well be the defining joke of our era theonion.com/guy-who-suck...”

e.w. niedermeyer post ↗

“From the Onion, though it's the most realistic AI headline I've seen in a while . . . theonion.com/guy-who-suck...”

Daniel Solove post ↗

Primary source theonion.com ↗

Established Policy & governance Signal 19d ago

6 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

6 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“I made jokes about this on twitter years ago and now it’s actually happening www.politico.com/news/2026/08...”

Rebecca Williams post ↗

“Bad content drives out good, painfully close to home edition. www.politico.com/news/2026/08...”

James Grimmelmann post ↗

Primary source politico.com ↗