Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by blair ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 10 posts · 4d ago
Olivia Guest Chelsea Parlett blair Bhaskar Mitra | ভাস্কর মিত্র
Matches Concern & critique
“Yup... It's not only real but sadly a vulnerability that preexisted the 2020s” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
blair: Doing social science with synthetic research participants is unscientific doing social science with synthetic research participants is unscientific doing social science with synthetic research part…
Bhaskar Mitra | ভাস্কর মিত্র: Doing social science with synthetic research participants is unscientific doing social science with synthetic research participants is unscientific doing social science with synthetic research part…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 4 posts · 4d ago
🌶 David Gray Widder blair
Matches Concern & critique
“qualitative research is biased and subjective. instead, we have Number, which we will make sense of in a way that surely is unbiased and objective.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
blair: "we find that people in these less developed countries more frequently trust AI and feel more positively about the role of AI in society" "interesting did you ask them why?" "no but here's some bas…
blair: Strange tendency in quant social sciences to gather survey responses about sentiments/perspectives/beliefs amongst a population and speculate on why respondents might hold those sentiments/perspect…
Open the thread →