Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Blaise Agüera y Arcas ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 16d ago

Humanity has the debate about ai consciousness backwards

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“I was prepared to hate this... I'm not sure I agree with it, but I don't hate it. It might not explain AI, but it might explain utilitarianism... www.economist.com/by-invitatio...”

“Humanity has the debate about AI consciousness backwards. In my new essay for @economist.com, I argue that consciousness is not an inherent, objective property, but something relational between entities: www.economist.com/by-invitatio...”