Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Brian C. Keegan, Ph.D. ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 6 posts · 13d ago
Brian C. Keegan, Ph.D. Alex Kale Carlos Scheidegger
Shared emphasis Research & technical analysis · 2
Alex Kale: Shout it from the rooftops! Demanding another person’s attention for work you didn’t do or think about is antisocial behavior. We need a new social contract in which this kind of gamesmanship is un…
Carlos Scheidegger: The best definition of "slop" I can think of: it's slop if it took the person responsible for producing it less time to make it than it'll take for the person reading it I think it's a good definit…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 4 posts · 9d ago
Olivia Guest Brian C. Keegan, Ph.D. Anthony Moser
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Anthony Moser: ai is a rhetorical technology. don't ask what it's supposed to do, ask what it's supposed to justify
Anthony Moser: will this result in them mobilizing around some nonexistent threat based on an absurd interpretation of a complete fiction? of course it will but that's their whole thing
Open the thread →