Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,365 searchable experts 2,967 tracked across all sources
Clear
Showing signals surfaced by Brian C. Keegan, Ph.D. ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.

Established Models & releases Development 16d ago
⚡ 83 h early
US government suspends Anthropic models

Statement on the US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5

34 experts across 6 network communities independently surfaced this.

34 experts 6 communities 1 sources clustered
Ethan Mollick Ramon Astudillo Justin Hendrix Suresh Venkatasubramanian Mike Masnick Anil Dash Tim Kellogg Sung Kim +26

“Well, this situation is confusing. www.anthropic.com/news/fable-m...”

“This is wild. www.anthropic.com/news/fable-m...”

5 experts discussed this · 40 posts
SE Gyges: us government has rendered it illegal to give access to fable or mythos to foreign nationals ^_^ www.anthropic.com/news/fable-m...
SE Gyges: this means nobody can have either of them btw. because they haven't KYC'd their customers hard enough.
SE Gyges: dario got what he wanted
Open the full discussion →
Primary source anthropic.com ↗
Established AI field signal Development 9d ago
⚡ 3 h early
AI fiction idiosyncrasies detection paper

AI Fiction Is Easy to Detect Because It's Stupid and Bad, Research Finds

7 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

7 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
Olivia Guest 404 Media Chris Brockett Brian C. Keegan, Ph.D. Ali Alkhatib Pavel By Cory Doctorow (GPG 0xBF3D9110957E5F4C)

“ChatGPT uses too many dream sequences and Gemini won’t stop describing characters.”

“this is interesting but i'm reluctant to get very attached to these analytical methods. a lot of computing researchers live for puzzles; if you tell them LLM outputs are identifiable by certain rhetorical cliches or structural tendencies, they'll work the p…”

5 experts discussed this · 23 posts
Ali Alkhatib: this is interesting but i'm reluctant to get very attached to these analytical methods. a lot of computing researchers live for puzzles; if you tell them LLM outputs are identifiable by certain rhe…
Ali Alkhatib: this is sort of a fundamental problem with pangram IMHO. if you restrict yourself from thinking critically about the author(s) as such and only look at syntax, you paint yourself very narrowly into…
Hypervisible : Even if it’s “good” by some metric, I don’t want to read it because it has no perspective or viewpoint.
Open the full discussion →
Primary source 404media.co ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article