Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Research & technical analysis
3 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Reaction converging Anatomy of a Frontier Lab Agent Intrusion: A Technical Timeline of the July 2026 Incident Concern & critique · 4 attributable reactions Reaction converging Its ai agent spent days hacking company sources say openai did not notice week Concern & critique · 5 attributable reactions Shared emphasis Safety alignment long horizon models Concern & critique · 2 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Andrea Lathrop ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI field signal Signal 13h ago

Anatomy of a Frontier Lab Agent Intrusion: A Technical Timeline of the July 2026 Incident

9 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 3 attributable expert contributions · Margaret Mitchell, Mark Riedl, René Walter
“We @hf.co made an interactive visual of the actual hack from the Hugging Face side: the attack chain across trust boundaries, phase activity, and the commands as they were recorded. Key #transparency . huggingface.co/blog/agent-i... Massive props to Hugo, A…” evidence ↗
9 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Margaret Mitchell Mark Riedl Simon Willison Alondra Nelson Suresh Venkatasubramanian Eileen Clancy 🧿 Gina Helfrich René Walter +1
3 experts discussed this · 17 posts
Simon Willison: Hugging Face just published a highly detailed technical account of OpenAI's accidental cyberattack on their systems - it's wild how sophisticated this was: huggingface.co/blog/agent-i... Wrote up s…
Alondra Nelson: Hugging Face just published a highly detailed technical account of OpenAI's accidental cyberattack on their systems - it's wild how sophisticated this was: huggingface.co/blog/agent-i... Wrote up s…
Grace: I think brute force is a reasonable description, in the sense that the agent tried a lot of approaches, most of which failed
Open the full discussion →
Primary source huggingface.co ↗
Developing Agents & robotics Signal 2d ago
⚡ 14 h early

Its ai agent spent days hacking company sources say openai did not notice week

14 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 5 attributable expert contributions · Casey Newton, Eryk Salvaggio, Tim Kellogg
“Rogue OpenAI agents are leaving notes to themselves on company servers to help them escape their test environments (!!!) www.reuters.com/business/its...” evidence ↗
14 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered
Casey Newton Justin Hendrix Eryk Salvaggio Tim Kellogg Chris Paxton Shannon Mattern Grace Eileen Clancy 🧿 +6
3 experts discussed this · 38 posts
Casey Newton: Rogue OpenAI agents are leaving notes to themselves on company servers to help them escape their test environments (!!!) www.reuters.com/business/its...
Casey Newton: my sense is that they were leaving the notes surreptitiously
Casey Newton: you deny that models are taking steps to hide their behavior during evaluations? because that's pretty well established
Open the full discussion →
Primary source reuters.com ↗
Established Safety & security Signal 6d ago
⚡ 2 h early

Safety alignment long horizon models

4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · Tim Kellogg, Dare Obasanjo
“the model that discovered the Erdos Conjecture disproof found and exploited holes in its sandbox this implies that it might not be GPT-5.6-Sol. They refer to it as a model trained to operate for a very long time. Maybe GPT-6? openai.com/index/safety...” evidence ↗
4 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Tim Kellogg Sung Kim Dare Obasanjo Andrea Lathrop
Primary source openai.com ↗
Established AI field signal Signal 5d ago

Gary Marcus

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Andrea Lathrop
“This is wild... Twitter search is broken, so I was trying to Google an old Tweet, and this AI (safety? think tank?) came up, with all of our tweets in in, and a lot of people in the online AI space have profiles where they re-blog your tweets: cafiac.com?q=…” evidence ↗
1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered
Andrea Lathrop

“This is wild... Twitter search is broken, so I was trying to Google an old Tweet, and this AI (safety? think tank?) came up, with all of our tweets in in, and a lot of people in the online AI space have profiles where they re-blog your tweets: cafiac.com?q=…”

Primary source cafiac.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 11 posts · 3d ago
Ted Underwood ae Doll Andrea Lathrop
Matches Concern & critique
“their answer to everything is to accuse their critics of “cope”. its just a group that has consistently demonstrated astonishingly poor judgement” evidence ↗
Doll: The vision of AGI/ASI that lab insiders tend to believe in is bugnuts insane though. Like its pure fantasy cooked up by yud and lesswrong and its unfalsifiable. Not very rational at all :p
Doll: It believes that most of them genunely believe it. It also believes they are in a cult.
Open the thread →
2 experts · 6 posts · 5d ago
Juan Diego Rodriguez Andrea Lathrop
Matches Concern & critique
“Has OpenAI released enough detail to know what *actually* happened? News outlets keep describing it like it's a willful entity with volition that cleverly, intentionally escaped its cage, which is …” evidence ↗
Andrea Lathrop: Has OpenAI released enough detail to know what *actually* happened? News outlets keep describing it like it's a willful entity with volition that cleverly, intentionally escaped its cage, which is …
Andrea Lathrop: I am not implying it was intentional on OpenAI's part... what I mean is 1. what was the actual task, 2. what had they optimized or fine-tuned each of the two running models to do, 3. what *specific…
Open the thread →