Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by cghlewis.bsky.social ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 8d ago

static.klipy.com

3 experts are actively discussing the implications.

1 expert 0 communities 1 sources clustered
cghlewis.bsky.social

“AI: Getting more and more advanced, things progressing quickly Me helping researchers: Let's talk about the benefits of documenting any work that you do, or naming things so that you understand them later.”

3 experts discussed this · 7 posts
cghlewis.bsky.social: I think that is a common theme at tech conferences right now.
Hadley Wickham: I don’t need to write that down, I’ll just remember it!
Hadley Wickham: He’s also super racist so there’s that
Open the full discussion →
Primary source static.klipy.com ↗