Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Chad Topaz Queer DEI Race Traitor ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI field signal Signal 18h ago
⚡ 1311 h early

pnas.org

3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“The diffusion of large language models in published academic articles www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...”

“I'm grateful to have been in (asynchronous) communication with @kylesiler.bsky.social about his important paper, "The diffusion of large language models in published academic articles." A colleague and I had comments; Siler had great responses. Read his ins…”

Developing AI field signal Signal 1d ago

pnas.org

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered

“I am very excited to have this out in PNAS as of right now. This one is a case of: I can believe a thing to be true (increased LLM usage) but I can also believe that a particular set of evidence does not demonstrate that truth. www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...”