Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by christiannolan.bsky.social ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Compute & infrastructure Analysis 18d ago
⚡ 30 h early
Open Knowledge Format data sharing Google Cloud

How the Open Knowledge Format can improve data sharing | Google Cloud Blog

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

3 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered

“Google's Open Knowledge Format (bit like llm.txt, i guess...) An open specification that formalizes the LLM-wiki pattern into a portable, interoperable format. cloud.google.com/blog/product...”

“cloud.google.com/blog/product... I sometimes like to imagine that AI is a psyop just to get people to improve documentation by elevating markdowns to “serious engineering””

2 experts discussed this · 5 posts
Emily Riederer: cloud.google.com/blog/product... I sometimes like to imagine that AI is a psyop just to get people to improve documentation by elevating markdowns to “serious engineering”
christiannolan.bsky.social: Oh so NOW it's valauble to keep the docs up to date? Now that a machine can read them? I feel this so hard
christiannolan.bsky.social: cloud.google.com/blog/product... I sometimes like to imagine that AI is a psyop just to get people to improve documentation by elevating markdowns to “serious engineering”
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article