Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources

Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Who is contributing? How are they reacting?

Topic Search developments Clear all

Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Research & technical analysis

1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓

Showing signals surfaced by Blake E. Reid ×

Most important

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI business Development 8d ago

⚡ 8 h early

Palantir CTO AI researchers smoking claim

7 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 4 attributable expert contributions · Mark Riedl, Anthony Moser, Stephen Turner

“This is dumb www.businessinsider.com/ai-researche...” evidence ↗

7 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered

How the network is reacting 4 experts are independently emphasizing research & technical analysis.

Reaction converging

4 experts

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“This is dumb www.businessinsider.com/ai-researche...”

Mark Riedl post ↗

2 experts discussed this · 2 posts

Karl Bode: CTO said a thing!

Open the full discussion →

Primary source businessinsider.com ↗