Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Clear
Showing signals surfaced by Ciara Rowles ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 20 posts · 9d ago
tachikoma: a thought came to me last night—there's not much incentive to create continuously operational AI is there? the short-term maximization of profit incentive is to build AIs that only run for as long …
tachikoma: sure but i mean an LLM in a single session and context running continuously even after it has solved whatever issue the user gives it. the GPUs/server would continue to run and serve other users ea…
Open the thread →
3 experts · 5 posts · 4d ago
Ethan Mollick: I still believe that everyone is too fixated on the state of play in AI right now (which labs are ahead, how to manage costs, etc.) and not focused enough on the continued steepness of the capabili…
Ethan Mollick: And this is not some reference to a future ASI (though it could be that too), but instead a reference to to where many observers expect the capability curve to be a year from now (exponentially imp…
Open the thread →