Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Will Lowe ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 8 posts · 4d ago
tweety fish: One major problem with the new crop of philosophy of AI stuff (of which I consider myself a part) is that the labeling and branding are totally externally driven. We are "philosophers of AI" becaus…
Jake Browning: I reviewed a proposal for a handbook on philosophy of AI recently and thought, "this looks nothing like the handbooks of a decade ago (which were all Phil mind and ethics) and much less technical t…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 3 posts · 5d ago
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Context & explanation · 1
Joanna Bryson: The company was pursuing a “research partnership with wisdom traditions”, it told me, to “help inform the moral formation of AI systems”. #wisdomTraditions #AIEthics
Joanna Bryson: Wow that #tag is as bad as you think (the first one)
Open the thread →