Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Damon Beres ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing AI field signal Analysis 1d ago
⚡ 4 h early
Atlantic post-AI slop essay

Is This What Comes After AI Slop?

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
Will Oremus Damon Beres

“A lot of people are reading AI-generated fiction without realizing it—"stanning" it on TikTok and Instagram, even—though in fairness a lot of people have been doing the same with what might be considered human-written "slop" as well, for quite some time”

2 experts discussed this · 10 posts
Damon Beres: A lot of people are reading AI-generated fiction without realizing it—"stanning" it on TikTok and Instagram, even—though in fairness a lot of people have been doing the same with what might be cons…
Damon Beres: The analysis is pretty damning.
Damon Beres: This makes me fairly depressed, I suppose, for the obvious reasons. I'm also not completely sure I can make up my mind about why I feel worse about someone consuming Daggermouth, or something like …
Open the full discussion →
Primary source theatlantic.com ↗