Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by danielroe.dev ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 19d ago
⚡ 58 h early

Cec8df9e b43b 4cd1 8feb c07e804e8d33

5 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

5 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Joe Bak-Coleman Martin Stabe Andy Masley Stefanie Hane danielroe.dev

“Absolutely essential reading about the impact of vibe coding on open source and the practice of software development generally, by @samlearner.bsky.social www.ft.com/content/cec8...”

Primary source ft.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 5 posts · 20d ago
apenwarr.ca danielroe.dev
apenwarr.ca: Finally tried fable yesterday (yes, I am still a late adopter). Like all LLMs, it still tells me as a genius. The difference is it makes it more convincing.
apenwarr.ca: In related news, if you open up its thinking trace: Fable talks like a normal person. It only breaks out the claudisms and glazing in its “official” response post thinking. It’s putting on a show.
Open the thread →