Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources

Build my stream Create my edition

Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Who is contributing? How are they reacting?

Topic Search developments Clear all

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique

1 live reaction map in this view Jump to the evidence ↓

Shared emphasis AI skeptics dubious of proposed slowdown Concern & critique · 2 attributable reactions

Showing signals surfaced by Dan McQuillan ×

New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing AI field signal Signal 2d ago

AI skeptics dubious of proposed slowdown

3 directory members surfaced this signal.

3 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered

Emily M. Bender Damien Williams Dan McQuillan

How the network is reacting 2 experts are emphasizing concern & critique.

Shared emphasis

Concern & critique

2 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“If we're only "pacing" and regulating to prevent an imagined future "Superintelligent AI" Armageddon, we're leaving the door open for these people to keep doing all kinds of very real, immediate, present-day harms, and that is exactly what they want. www.sf…”

Damien Williams post ↗

Primary source sfexaminer.com ↗