Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,365 searchable experts 2,967 tracked across all sources

Showing signals surfaced by David Mimno ×

Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 12 posts · 15d ago

David Mimno David Jurgens Marzena Karpinska Alexander Hoyle Carlos Gómez-Rodríguez

Marzena Karpinska: Only 17% of May #ARR authors are qualified for reviewing, and almost 40% of papers have no qualified people?!?!

David Mimno: is anyone there suggesting not allowing submissions with no qualified reviewers? Elitist and gate-keepy yes, but is there a better option?

Open the thread →

4 experts · 7 posts · 14d ago

Eugene Vinitsky David Mimno Juan Diego Rodriguez Michiel van de Panne A. Feder Cooper

Eugene Vinitsky: If your paper doesn't have a big limitations section, you're doing your readers a disservice by forcing them to discover failures you already know about

Eugene Vinitsky: I do hate when reviewers throw our limitations section back in our faces but I'm super proud of those sections

Open the thread →

2 experts · 2 posts · 6d ago

David Mimno Joanna Bryson

David Mimno: I remain convinced that 98% of the compute of today’s LLMs is wasted. Fix that before you drive up my electric bill, hyperscalers.

Joanna Bryson: I remain convinced that 98% of the compute of today’s LLMs is wasted. Fix that before you drive up my electric bill, hyperscalers.

Open the thread →

2 experts · 3 posts · 15d ago

David Mimno James MacGlashan

David Mimno: One should be able to make a decent living as an AI research critic

David Mimno: you would have to wear a disguise to go to a poster session

Open the thread →