Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by david-p-reichert.bsky.social ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New Models & releases Analysis 13h ago
Suleyman model welfare warning

A warning about ‘model welfare’

7 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · René Walter
“Mustafa Suleyman @mustafasuleymanai.bsky.social with a "warning about ‘model welfare’" against training models to "believe" they might be conscious. mustafa-suleyman.ai/a-warning-ab... "AIs do not have rights, feelings, or consciousness. And we must not tra…” evidence ↗
7 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered

“Mustafa Suleyman @mustafasuleymanai.bsky.social with a "warning about ‘model welfare’" against training models to "believe" they might be conscious. mustafa-suleyman.ai/a-warning-ab... "AIs do not have rights, feelings, or consciousness. And we must not tra…”

“A prime example of why AI 'leaders' are not who anyone should be listening to about AI, right and consciousness. It's not all wrong! In fact, it starts off very sensibly: "AIs do not have rights, feelings, or consciousness. And we must not train them to act…”

2 experts discussed this · 23 posts
Shannon Vallor: A prime example of why AI 'leaders' are not who anyone should be listening to about AI, right and consciousness. It's not all wrong! In fact, it starts off very sensibly: "AIs do not have rights, f…
Shannon Vallor: This essay is such a weird, incoherent bag of correct, useful insights (mostly echoing the work of others who aren't cited, with the welcome exception of @anilseth.bsky.social), mixed with 'wait wh…
Luke Stark: A prime example of why AI 'leaders' are not who anyone should be listening to about AI, right and consciousness. It's not all wrong! In fact, it starts off very sensibly: "AIs do not have rights, f…
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 22 posts · 4d ago
Matches Research & technical analysis
“According to the actual research this isn’t actually a hypothetical there is a difference. The guy smashing things in fronof others is doing it as a performative act of intimidation and practice to…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Research & technical analysis · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Doll: Also a red herring in this case
Doll: No :) bsky.app/profile/doll...
Open the thread →