Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Clear
Showing signals surfaced by David Lazer ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.

New Culture, work & education Signal 15h ago

Trump research funding artificial intelligence

5 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

5 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
David Lazer Eileen Clancy 🧿 Larry Hunter Shobita Parthasarathy Dr Keith Wilson 🏳️‍🌈

“I suffered through Kratsios' answer to Science: the Endless Frontier. The NYT summary is good, but there's more to it. And I should say that I welcome improvements to the scientific enterprise (which is why I'm participating in @alondra.bsky.social and Jenn…”

Primary source nytimes.com ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 17 posts · 5d ago
Ted Underwood David Lazer Laura K. Nelson Max Woolf
Laura K. Nelson: The free version of ChatGPT automatically searches the web. The prompt "What are the most relevant sources for the claim that LLMs hallucinate?" returns the following. All those link buttons in the…
Laura K. Nelson: In my own N=1 experience, the links I get from (free) ChatGPT are almost always more relevant and helpful than what I get from Google(+Scholar). It just works better for me as a way to find relevan…
Open the thread →