Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Deb Raji ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Safety & security Analysis 14d ago
alignment artificiality essay

The Artificiality of Alignment

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered

“Anyways, here's some of that discourse from 2019; https://t.co/pzBqIF2MEA + Communities like MD4SG, who piloted in 2016; https://t.co/3CQxeNxYiw And folks like @jessicadai_ explicitly drawing bridges to the language of "alignment" in 2023; https://t.co/3etN…”

“joinreboot.org/p/alignment “All of the AI x-risk scenarios involve a world where we have decided to abdicate responsibility to an algorithm…. There are technical challenges, to be sure, but focusing at the scale of technical decisions elides these higher-le…”