Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by David Marx ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 7 posts · 6d ago
Sung Kim David Marx
Matches Concern & critique
“two points of constructive criticism: 1. If your program's API is appropriately testable, you shouldn't need to spin up a separate API for the agent. They should be able to invoke the same API your…” evidence ↗
Sung Kim: You'll be surprised how many unexpected bugs and inconsistencies this approach uncovers, even when your existing tests pass. Make sure the agent verifies expected results and application state chan…
Sung Kim: One effective approach is to have your AI coding agent create an API using the OpenAPI standard, generate an SDK, and then use that SDK to perform black box testing against the running app.
Open the thread →