Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Dmytro Mishkin ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing AI research Research 2d ago
robust local optimization paper

Robust Local Optimization Done Right

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“Robust Local Optimization Done Right James Pritts, Kevin Köser tl;dr: a Welsch robust loss with half-quadratic optimization, or how to use outliers to help. Sota in inl_th robustness vs SIMFIT++. also - RANSAC in Julia arxiv.org/abs/2610.05743 github.com/Vi…”

Established AI field signal Signal 17d ago

arxiv.org

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“Some work on similar, but for algorithmic case, when you kind of want to do it. arxiv.org/pdf/2503.13433 Earlier work from ours, arxiv.org/pdf/2003.01587 The issue is not tuning on test alone - it is tuning for YOUR method, crappy baseline of other - every …”

Established AI field signal Signal 17d ago

arxiv.org

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“Some work on similar, but for algorithmic case, when you kind of want to do it. arxiv.org/pdf/2503.13433 Earlier work from ours, arxiv.org/pdf/2003.01587 The issue is not tuning on test alone - it is tuning for YOUR method, crappy baseline of other - every …”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article