Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Dmytro Mishkin ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 4d ago

Doomed to Re-Annotate, Forever: The ImageNet Story

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“Doomed to Re-Annotate, Forever: The ImageNet Story Illia Volkov, Nikita Kisel, Tetiana Mishkina, @klara-cz.bsky.social Jiri Matas tl;dr: ImageNet val annotation with all bboxes, careful study of concepts, attributes (is drawing of a cat, a cat?) Year of eff…”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 6 posts · 4d ago
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
David Picard: It's a cool paper, both old school and new school. There's an Easter egg: I designed a game for the teaser. Did you get it right? I tried it in my ML course and almost nobody got it.
Dmytro Mishkin: I got one very confidently (2nd from page 10), and another one was tie, and I did select wrong.
Open the thread →