Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Eiko Fried ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing Evaluation & benchmarks Research 1d ago
⚡ 15 h early
semantic embeddings psychological taxonomy paper

Semantic embeddings reveal and address taxonomic incommensurability in psychological measurement - Nature Human Behaviour

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“2025 paper on automated detection of jingle-jangle based on LLM embeddings. Here a proof of principle where they highlight personality scales high in label similarity (similar scale name) but low in item similarity [blue, jingle] and vice versa [beige, jang…”

Developing Evaluation & benchmarks Signal 1d ago
⚡ 31 h early

Semantic embeddings reveal and address taxonomic incommensurability in psychological measurement - Nature Human Behaviour

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“2025 paper on automated detection of jingle-jangle based on LLM embeddings. Here a proof of principle where they highlight personality scales high in label similarity (similar scale name) but low in item similarity [blue, jingle] and vice versa [beige, jang…”

Developing Evaluation & benchmarks Signal 1d ago
⚡ 33 h early

Semantic embeddings reveal and address taxonomic incommensurability in psychological measurement - Nature Human Behaviour

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“2025 paper on automated detection of jingle-jangle based on LLM embeddings. Here a proof of principle where they highlight personality scales high in label similarity (similar scale name) but low in item similarity [blue, jingle] and vice versa [beige, jang…”

Developing Evaluation & benchmarks Signal 1d ago

Semantic embeddings reveal and address taxonomic incommensurability in psychological measurement - Nature Human Behaviour

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“2025 paper on automated detection of jingle-jangle based on LLM embeddings. Here a proof of principle where they highlight personality scales high in label similarity (similar scale name) but low in item similarity [blue, jingle] and vice versa [beige, jang…”

Developing Evaluation & benchmarks Signal 1d ago

Semantic embeddings reveal and address taxonomic incommensurability in psychological measurement - Nature Human Behaviour

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“2025 paper on automated detection of jingle-jangle based on LLM embeddings. Here a proof of principle where they highlight personality scales high in label similarity (similar scale name) but low in item similarity [blue, jingle] and vice versa [beige, jang…”

Developing Evaluation & benchmarks Signal 1d ago

Semantic embeddings reveal and address taxonomic incommensurability in psychological measurement - Nature Human Behaviour

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“2025 paper on automated detection of jingle-jangle based on LLM embeddings. Here a proof of principle where they highlight personality scales high in label similarity (similar scale name) but low in item similarity [blue, jingle] and vice versa [beige, jang…”

Developing Evaluation & benchmarks Signal 1d ago

Semantic embeddings reveal and address taxonomic incommensurability in psychological measurement - Nature Human Behaviour

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“2025 paper on automated detection of jingle-jangle based on LLM embeddings. Here a proof of principle where they highlight personality scales high in label similarity (similar scale name) but low in item similarity [blue, jingle] and vice versa [beige, jang…”

Developing Evaluation & benchmarks Signal 1d ago

Semantic embeddings reveal and address taxonomic incommensurability in psychological measurement - Nature Human Behaviour

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“2025 paper on automated detection of jingle-jangle based on LLM embeddings. Here a proof of principle where they highlight personality scales high in label similarity (similar scale name) but low in item similarity [blue, jingle] and vice versa [beige, jang…”