Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Research & technical analysis reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Emily Feng ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New Models & releases Signal 8h ago

Anthropic ai biological weapons

8 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Research & technical analysis reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Shannon Mattern
““Anthropic said it could not determine whether the research served a legitimate or nefarious purpose because valid biological inquiry… can also help engineer dangerous pathogens.” Reminiscing on the days when we had peer review panels with enough subject ex…” evidence ↗
8 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered