Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Eric Topol ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI research Signal 13d ago

Why Scientists See AI Leaders as False Prophets

3 experts are actively discussing the implications.

1 expert 0 communities 1 sources clustered
Eric Topol

“On AI curing all diseases theinformation.com/articles/ai-...”

3 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Eric Topol: On AI curing all diseases theinformation.com/articles/ai-...
Nafnlaus 🇮🇸 🇺🇦: More of a question is, how *do* you dramatically speed up treatment development? Forget AI for a second. Picture that budgets were 100x'ed, and whatever policy you wrote up, governments around the …
Mél Hogan / The Data Fix: Can you explain what kind of AI (was used in the melanoma vaccine)? Was it genAI or a different type of AI? Thank you!
Open the full discussion →
Primary source theinformation.com ↗