Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Federico Pianzola ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 3d ago
⚡ 7 h early

Back-to-basics: unobservable constructs and their ‘surplus meaning’ - (Un)rigorous AI

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
Alexandra Olteanu Federico Pianzola

“Wrote another brief post motivated by a reflection on how in AI research folks might not fully appreciate the care that working with unobservable constructs requires. TL;DR -- Because unobservable constructs hold ‘surplus meaning,’ your metric is not your c…”

Primary source rigor-in-ai.leaflet.pub ↗
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article