Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Gabriel Peyré ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 8d ago

Icnn universality and depth

3 experts are actively discussing the implications.

2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
Gabriel Peyré Rémi Flamary

“Approximating convex functions is hard; input-convex neural networks (ReLu networks with positive weights) are convex, but for finite depth, they are not universal approximators. www.gpeyre.com/blog/2026/10...”

3 experts discussed this · 5 posts
Gabriel Peyré: Approximating convex functions is hard; input-convex neural networks (ReLu networks with positive weights) are convex, but for finite depth, they are not universal approximators. www.gpeyre.com/blo…
Rémi Flamary : Approximating convex functions is hard; input-convex neural networks (ReLu networks with positive weights) are convex, but for finite depth, they are not universal approximators. www.gpeyre.com/blo…
David Picard: One banger post per day! I'm becoming suspicious you're drinking the potion magique from Panoramix 😉
Open the full discussion →
Primary source gpeyre.com ↗