Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Jerry Spanakis 🟥 ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Agents & robotics Signal 6d ago
⚡ 90 h early

Accurate but Not Humble: Evaluating Epistemic Humility in LLM Agents under Knowledge Conflict

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“If an LLM agent notices conflicts, will it tell you? Our #EMNLP2026 Findings paper finds that higher accuracy doesn't always mean greater epistemic humility: agents can spot conflicts early yet leave uncertainty out of wrong answers. 📄 arxiv.org/abs/2610.12…”

Established Agents & robotics Signal 6d ago
⚡ 90 h early

Accurate but Not Humble: Evaluating Epistemic Humility in LLM Agents under Knowledge Conflict

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“If an LLM agent notices conflicts, will it tell you? Our #EMNLP2026 Findings paper finds that higher accuracy doesn't always mean greater epistemic humility: agents can spot conflicts early yet leave uncertainty out of wrong answers. 📄 arxiv.org/abs/2610.12…”