Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Gergely Orosz ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
More conversations

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 8 posts · 15d ago
Gergely Orosz dan austin
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Gergely Orosz: With every new model, I put it to the test in writing - to see if I could do what I do - I give it a bunch of interviews I did on a topic, and ask to write an article in my style. The models fail s…
Gergely Orosz: If there is "understanding" it is superficial. I do find it useful to eg generate ideas, check if I missed something etc, but I still cannot find "thinking" in any domain I know very well... and a …
Open the thread →