Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Clear
Showing signals surfaced by Gillian Hadfield ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; expert reactions remain attributable.

Established AI field signal Development 8d ago
⚡ 4 h early
Nobel laureates AI economic action call

We Must Act Now

8 experts across 4 network communities independently surfaced this.

8 experts 4 communities 1 sources clustered

“If current trajectories of AI development continue, it is highly plausible that AI will drastically transform our economies. We must make collective, democratic choices, rather than letting market forces play out and risking leaving most citizens behind. di…”

“200 AI researchers and economists sign an open letter to policymakers www.wemustactnow.ai”

2 experts discussed this · 4 posts
tante: Oh, is it "AI is super powerful and we who are pushing for AI everywhere warn that we might have created a dangerous god from reddit posts" time of the month again? This is Anthropic/OpenAI PR and …
tante: nope that's it. These folks are getting lazier by the day
tante: Yeah. They spend just a handful of tokens on this website.
Open the full discussion →
Established Policy & governance Development 13d ago
⚡ 62 h early
Illinois Pritzker signs AI bill

Pritzker signs landmark AI regulation bill that aims to mitigate risks

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“5/ Illinois has done something important in passing this bill, but the work is not over yet. Read more about the bill here: buff.ly/jurccfl”

Established AI field signal Signal 13d ago

buff.ly

1 directory member surfaced this signal.

1 expert 1 community 1 sources clustered

“4/ Right now the decision on what counts as safe sits with private companies, not with anyone democratically accountable. Jack Clark and I called this the democratic deficit in our regulatory markets paper. buff.ly/5S8JRaD”