Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Questions & unknowns reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Grace ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

5 experts · 23 posts · 4d ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“Alignment to humanity? Theres no such thing. We have competing interests. So that cant be true. Alignment to a set of ideals? Who gets to decide those? Are they auditable? Somewhat. Beholden to dem…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 2 Questions & unknowns · 2
Dustin Moskovitz: Apparently the government is against moving the AI frontier until jailbreaks are solved. For the uninitiated, jailbreaks have existed since the beginning and as far as we know so far, cannot be sol…
Grace: I’m so curious what the actual jailbreak is
Open the thread →
4 experts · 21 posts · 4d ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“Up to Opus 4.6, Claude was *much* better at code switching in real time. I would catch it downshifting after summarizing an article and my first question (one time I asked and it said "Ha! Busted!"…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 2 Questions & unknowns · 1
Grace: Another possibility is that fable is much better than humans at developing task-specific ontologies / semantic neologisms
Grace: Maybe that’s just broke and bespoke combined? (Besproke?)
Open the thread →
4 experts · 12 posts · 6d ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“relationship humans and AIs have with each other. By the time ASI is here and able to answer our questions about consciousness with high confidence, we may be in a less malleable state.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Opportunity & adoption · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Grace: I’m optimistic that it has an as-good-or-better shot than humans at doing this
Grace: Related
Open the thread →