Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Questions & unknowns reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Cat Hicks ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

New AI field signal Resource 22h ago
⚡ 206 h early
OSF open science framework resource

OSF

6 experts are actively discussing the implications.

Why this matches Questions & unknowns reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Cat Hicks
“I think this is the paper? it's a preprint osf.io/preprints/ps... The questions are media trivia questions, which aren't exactly judgment questions. Presenting "AI" that's forced to be incorrect basically just tests whether participants trust it to be a loo…” evidence ↗
2 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered
How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.
Multiple readings

Opportunity & adoption

1 expert

New capabilities, benefits and practical upside.

“This pre-print that was doing the rounds the other day is a useful touchpoint on this osf.io/preprints/ps... as is dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/...”

Questions & unknowns

1 expert

What remains unresolved or contested.

“I think this is the paper? it's a preprint osf.io/preprints/ps... The questions are media trivia questions, which aren't exactly judgment questions. Presenting "AI" that's forced to be incorrect basically just tests whether participants trust it to be a loo…”

6 experts discussed this · 40 posts
Rachel Coldicutt: Okay, fellow AI/sociotechnical researchers, I'm looking for a name for something but can't find anything in my lit searches: is there a term for the phenomenon where someone has false confidence in…
Rachel Coldicutt: It's not the same as either the Dunning-Kruger Effect or cognitive offloading: I want to describe the what happens when you have both overconfidence in the technology AND in your own skills
Rachel Coldicutt: I mean maybe it doesn't yet have a name.
Open the full discussion →

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 3 posts · 16d ago
Matches Questions & unknowns
“Wait, why did it start to decline even before we got a thingie to help us?..” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Questions & unknowns · 1
Arseny Khakhalin: Wait, why did it start to decline even before we got a thingie to help us?..
Arseny Khakhalin: Ahh, that's right, I remember it now, thank you! I read about it at some point, about the friction and culture erosion. Makes sense!
Open the thread →