Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Matt Davies ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Safety & security Signal 11d ago
⚡ 5 h early

A troubling rogue AI incident shows why the U.K. AI Security Institute deserves greater scrutiny | Fortune

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered

“Read the full article here: fortune.com/2026/08/25/u... /end”

“Superb post on UK AISI echoing some of our analysis at Ada. Key point is towards the end: "voluntary governance schemes are insufficient... the government agency becomes captive to the companies it is supposed to monitor because it is dependent on their goo…”