Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources

Build my stream Create my edition

Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Who is contributing? How are they reacting?

Topic Search developments Clear all

Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

Concern & critique

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Policy & governance Research & technical analysis

2 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓

Multiple readings Ai silicon valley Concern & critique · 3 attributable reactions Multiple readings papers.ssrn.com Concern & critique · 2 attributable reactions

Showing signals surfaced by Woodrow Hartzog ×

New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Accelerating AI field signal Signal 10h ago

Ai silicon valley

7 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · rat king 🐀 👑 , Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis

“well written, well argued presentation of real world harms of AI without going into histrionics it won’t get the same amount of pickup bc it’s not scifi coded, but it’s just as concerned https://t.co/ko6nLkYr3L https://t.co/JgaVpDrbaO” evidence ↗

7 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

Boaz Barak rat king 🐀 👑 Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis Bill Gurley Woodrow Hartzog Frank Pasquale Adam Becker

How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.

Multiple readings

Concern & critique

2 experts

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“well written, well argued presentation of real world harms of AI without going into histrionics it won’t get the same amount of pickup bc it’s not scifi coded, but it’s just as concerned https://t.co/ko6nLkYr3L https://t.co/JgaVpDrbaO”

rat king 🐀 👑 post ↗

Policy & governance

1 expert

Rules, institutions and accountability.

“Great piece that helps explain the seemingly contradictory rhetoric emanating from the closed AI model companies. I agree the #1 actionable take is to hold the companies accountable for their product’s behavior. https://t.co/WQ60O1WlDr”

Bill Gurley post ↗

Primary source nytimes.com ↗

New AI field signal Signal 9h ago

papers.ssrn.com

4 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Woodrow Hartzog

“I have posted a new draft w/ @jessicasilbey.bsky.social titled "AI Slop." We argue that "AI slop" isn't just slang. It's useful for distinguishing between cheap and dangerous AI output and the kinds of meaningful human authorship that strengthen our cultura…” evidence ↗

4 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

Hypervisible Woodrow Hartzog Frank Pasquale Amanda Tepski

How the network is reacting Experts are approaching this through 2 distinct lenses.

Multiple readings

Concern & critique

1 expert

Risks, limits and unintended consequences.

“I have posted a new draft w/ @jessicasilbey.bsky.social titled "AI Slop." We argue that "AI slop" isn't just slang. It's useful for distinguishing between cheap and dangerous AI output and the kinds of meaningful human authorship that strengthen our cultura…”

Woodrow Hartzog post ↗

Research & technical analysis

1 expert

Evidence, methods and technical implications.

“Interesting approach to AI slop!: "We propose a provisional definition of slop as any output of a probabilistic automated system produced with little exertion that asymmetrically burdens recipients and tends to degrade cultural domains." papers.ssrn.com/sol…”

Frank Pasquale post ↗

Primary source papers.ssrn.com ↗