Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Mar Hicks ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 10 posts · 4d ago
Matches Concern & critique
“Misleading headline though, he specifically warns about "AI systems capable of setting their own objectives, earning money and owning assets" which would "essentially seeding a new silicon species".” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Building & implementation · 1
VE, cybersocial occult investigator: As I was saying about Microsoft having their own in-house AI cultists. The specifically weird and salacious people at the frontier labs are far from the only new religious movement driving AI leade…
René Walter: Misleading headline though, he specifically warns about "AI systems capable of setting their own objectives, earning money and owning assets" which would "essentially seeding a new silicon species".
Open the thread →