Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Building & implementation reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Iris van Rooij ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing AI field signal Signal 2d ago

Opposing the inevitability of ai at universities is possible and necessary

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

Why this matches Building & implementation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Iris van Rooij
“It’s not the first time that universities have gotten tangled up with developments that would later come to haunt them, explains @olivia.science … ‘From combustion engines to tobacco, universities have been used in the past to whitewash now-controversial pr…” evidence ↗
2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
2 experts discussed this · 15 posts
Iris van Rooij: ‘Study after study shows that students want to develop these critical thinking skills, are not lazy, and large numbers of them would be in favor of banning ChatGPT and similar tools in universities…
Luke Stark: ‘Study after study shows that students want to develop these critical thinking skills, are not lazy, and large numbers of them would be in favor of banning ChatGPT and similar tools in universities…
Iris van Rooij: See also bsky.app/profile/iris...
Open the full discussion →
Developing AI research Research 1d ago
⚡ 2283 h early
AI theoretical tool cognitive science paper

Reclaiming AI as a Theoretical Tool for Cognitive Science - Computational Brain & Behavior

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Building & implementation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Olivia Guest
“the paper on reverse engineering I linked to has many references on this / what happens if you grant formal realism / naive computationalism / makeism see, e.g. doi.org/10.1007/s421... doi.org/10.1007/s110... doi.org/10.1016/j.ja...” evidence ↗
2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered

“the paper on reverse engineering I linked to has many references on this / what happens if you grant formal realism / naive computationalism / makeism see, e.g. doi.org/10.1007/s421... doi.org/10.1007/s110... doi.org/10.1016/j.ja...”

Established AI field signal Resource 15d ago
⚡ 1225 h early
metatheory space resource site

metatheory.space

2 directory members surfaced this signal.

Why this matches Building & implementation reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Olivia Guest
“Inspired by @seanpmackinnon.bsky.social on "curating reading lists for others", here's a thread with some of mine for when people want to collaborate: 1) How do we build theory? 2) What does computationalism imply? 3) How do we use models? 4) What happens w…” evidence ↗
2 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered

“Inspired by @seanpmackinnon.bsky.social on "curating reading lists for others", here's a thread with some of mine for when people want to collaborate: 1) How do we build theory? 2) What does computationalism imply? 3) How do we use models? 4) What happens w…”

“And even more info here metatheory.space”

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 27 posts · 13d ago
Matches Building & implementation
“Also test driven development is a great example of how most of the problems with LLMs predate them. Humans are perfectly capable of building elaborate processes that do not meaningfully address the…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Anthony Moser: This is unsurprising because ai generated code *is* ai generated text. Code is text. People think code is different because you can test to see if it runs. But that just tells you if it runs (or pa…
Anthony Moser: Whether the program makes sense is about the relationship of the program to the larger world, the human processes in which it is embedded It is, by definition, external to the program. That's what …
Open the thread →