Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Markets & investment reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Isaiah Bishop ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 14 posts · 9d ago
Matches Markets & investment
“Mathematicians have always kind of been in it for the love of the game, but thats a weird funding model for the govt. Like fund this weird dudes research into fundamental normalized co-sheafs of di…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Markets & investment · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Isaiah Bishop: Mathematicians have always kind of been in it for the love of the game, but thats a weird funding model for the govt. Like fund this weird dudes research into fundamental normalized co-sheafs of di…
Ben Recht: Hate to say it, but we pay them to teach calculus.
Open the thread →