Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Isaiah Bishop ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 5 posts · 12h ago
SE Gyges Isaiah Bishop Andrea Lathrop
SE Gyges: i am actually pretty sympathetic to this; "we personally are clearly not able to figure out how to mitigate the impact of what we're doing" is obviously true the problem is they somehow reach the o…
Isaiah Bishop: it would be more believable if they took more of this stuff seriously at say OpenAI
Open the thread →
2 experts · 6 posts · 4d ago
Isaiah Bishop Singularity's Bounty e/cc
Multiple readings Policy & governance · 1 Research & technical analysis · 1
Isaiah Bishop: FWIW i had to argue with the bird lawyer about what deterministic was, and it was maybe the worst conversation i had on here
Isaiah Bishop: i was told that LLMs are always optimized towards a fixed benchmark, i mentioned you could create a living benchmark that moved to people's tastes but could never be strictly satiated, was told tha…
Open the thread →