Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique
0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Jason Koebler ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Models & releases Development 9d ago
⚡ 5 h early
OpenAI Project Lily chat review program

Inside ‘Project Lily’: The Humans Reading Your ChatGPT Chats

17 experts across 5 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Sam Cole
“this is so fucking crazy. huge huge huge scoop www.404media.co/inside-proje...” evidence ↗
17 experts 5 communities 1 sources clustered
Olivia Guest 404 Media Chris Brockett Anil Dash Joseph Cox Damien Williams Sarah T Roberts, PhD Luke Stark +9

“this is so fucking crazy. huge huge huge scoop www.404media.co/inside-proje...”

“Make real how much labour is stolen and hidden with it too.”

2 experts discussed this · 4 posts
Sam Cole: this is so fucking crazy. huge huge huge scoop www.404media.co/inside-proje...
404 Media: this is so fucking crazy. huge huge huge scoop www.404media.co/inside-proje...
Eileen Clancy 🧿: @mbarany.com I am absolutely certain this doesn't happen for maths prompts. Right? Yeah? 🙃
Open the full discussion →
Primary source 404media.co ↗
Established AI field signal Analysis 15d ago
⚡ 4 h early
AI existential risk YouTube video

So... Is AI Going to Kill Us All???

2 experts are actively discussing the implications.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · 404 Media
“Is AI going to kill us all in 10 years? Discussions of AI doom or existential risk are complicated because they often serve as marketing or excuses for regulatory capture for the biggest AI companies. @emanuelmaiberg.bsky.social breaks it down. Watch more: …” evidence ↗
3 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
404 Media Jason Koebler Emanuel Maiberg

“Is AI going to kill us all in 10 years? Discussions of AI doom or existential risk are complicated because they often serve as marketing or excuses for regulatory capture for the biggest AI companies. @emanuelmaiberg.bsky.social breaks it down. Watch more: …”

“emanuel and i attempted to talk about how we talk about and report on AI. we included this in our subscriber NL this week it's an informal convo we had bc we've been slacking about how and if to cover the Anthropic stuff, as well as changing capabilities of…”

2 experts discussed this · 8 posts
Jason Koebler: emanuel and i attempted to talk about how we talk about and report on AI. we included this in our subscriber NL this week it's an informal convo we had bc we've been slacking about how and if to co…
Emanuel Maiberg: emanuel and i attempted to talk about how we talk about and report on AI. we included this in our subscriber NL this week it's an informal convo we had bc we've been slacking about how and if to co…
Jason Koebler: not because i think AI necessarily is scary or sentient or bc i believe everything in here, but ai companies now have the social media content moderation problem of the last decade: a billion peopl…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source youtube.com ↗