Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,364 searchable experts 2,966 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Markets & investment reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Jed Brown ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

4 experts · 4 posts · 14d ago
Matches Markets & investment
“I talk to a lot of startups building security tools for AI agents, and my advice to all of them is, treat AI agents like malware. Even if agents provide a lot of value to those who use them, agents…” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Concern & critique · 1 Markets & investment · 1
Kelsey Hightower: I talk to a lot of startups building security tools for AI agents, and my advice to all of them is, treat AI agents like malware. Even if agents provide a lot of value to those who use them, agents…
Veni Kunche: I talk to a lot of startups building security tools for AI agents, and my advice to all of them is, treat AI agents like malware. Even if agents provide a lot of value to those who use them, agents…
Open the thread →
2 experts · 5 posts · 6d ago
Matches Markets & investment
“Thakur v Trump continues to deliver the goods. Recall that it was brought by faculty (not the University of California) and is the same case that got UCLA funding restored last year, before UC coul…” evidence ↗
Jed Brown: Thakur v Trump continues to deliver the goods. Recall that it was brought by faculty (not the University of California) and is the same case that got UCLA funding restored last year, before UC coul…
Eileen Clancy 🧿: Thakur v Trump continues to deliver the goods. Recall that it was brought by faculty (not the University of California) and is the same case that got UCLA funding restored last year, before UC coul…
Open the thread →