Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Concern & critique reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Concern & critique Context & explanation Policy & governance
2 live reaction maps in this view Jump to the evidence ↓
Multiple readings Words matter damnit fc883733a729 Concern & critique · 2 attributable reactions Multiple readings Ai silicon valley Concern & critique · 3 attributable reactions
Showing signals surfaced by Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis ×
Debated

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established AI field signal Signal 20d ago
⚡ 99 h early

Words matter damnit fc883733a729

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 1 attributable expert contribution · Eryk Salvaggio
“I genuinely have no idea what Jeff Jarvis is arguing here. Is he arguing for the right to select the words we use? Because we do not select individual words when using an LLM. Is he concerned about Claude's freedom of expression? Because that might be even …” evidence ↗
4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Eryk Salvaggio Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis Alex Hern Colin
3 experts discussed this · 15 posts
Eryk Salvaggio: I genuinely have no idea what Jeff Jarvis is arguing here. Is he arguing for the right to select the words we use? Because we do not select individual words when using an LLM. Is he concerned about…
Benjamin Riley: Great example of how not understanding how these things work can lead to a presumably well-intentioned but totally misguided perspective.
Eryk Salvaggio: My sense is that this might be about the devaluing of the craft of writing and word choice, but the selection criteria of words for a language model is already doing that: language already shows up…
Open the full discussion →
Primary source medium.com ↗
New AI field signal Signal 6h ago

Ai silicon valley

9 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

Why this matches Concern & critique reaction 2 attributable expert contributions · rat king 🐀 👑 , Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis
“well written, well argued presentation of real world harms of AI without going into histrionics it won’t get the same amount of pickup bc it’s not scifi coded, but it’s just as concerned https://t.co/ko6nLkYr3L https://t.co/JgaVpDrbaO” evidence ↗
9 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
Boaz Barak Eryk Salvaggio rat king 🐀 👑 Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis Bill Gurley Woodrow Hartzog Frank Pasquale Adam Becker +1
2 experts discussed this · 2 posts
Eryk Salvaggio: This is a good succinct summary of the intelligence-as-ideology effects I’ve also been talking about lately (Gift Link): www.nytimes.com/2026/09/05/o...
tweety fish: This is a good succinct summary of the intelligence-as-ideology effects I’ve also been talking about lately (Gift Link): www.nytimes.com/2026/09/05/o...
tweety fish: the amount of begging the question that has infected the discourse top to bottom when new models come out is uh well it's not my favorite
Open the full discussion →
Primary source nytimes.com ↗