Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

Showing signals surfaced by Jeff (Gutenberg Parenthesis) Jarvis ×

The questions experts are actively pulling apart

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Safety & security Signal 4d ago

Anthropic ai safety

3 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered
4 experts discussed this · 7 posts
Mark Riedl: Snark alert: let me just note that some employees of OpenAI and Anthropic already “foresee” a 10% chance of 8 billion people.
Mark Riedl: Anthropic floats a sample bill. It would allow the gov’t to block a model that has a “foreseeable, imminent risk of more than $1 billion in damages, or of killing or seriously injuring more than 50…
Andrea Lathrop: (but with this bill, they can only get shut down if METR foresees it for them.)
Open the full discussion →