Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
Active evidence filter

Showing developments with attributable Building & implementation reactions.

New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Joshua Grochow ×

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

2 experts · 7 posts · 4d ago
Matches Building & implementation
“we must build the people eating machine because otherwise someone else will build the people eating machine and they will be less nice.” evidence ↗
Multiple readings Building & implementation · 1 Opportunity & adoption · 1
Joshua Grochow: Starting to get kinda annoyed at senior mathematicians saying "I use AI to speed up my work because I have to. But we must protect junior researchers from being scooped. I just have no idea how!" Y…
Joshua Grochow: If you're worried an AI company would do it instead: (1) in most cases they probably won't*, and (2) even if you don't believe #1, by you doing it instead of an AI company (or internet rando) doing…
Open the thread →