Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by James Tauber ×
New & accelerating

What is moving across the network now

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

No developments match these filters yet.

Try the field-wide view or clear one of the filters.

Clear filters
Debates gaining attention

What experts are discussing without an anchoring article

3 experts · 7 posts · 3d ago
Tim Kellogg Mark J. Nelson James Tauber
Shared emphasis Questions & unknowns · 2
Tim Kellogg: i've long argued that "AI" is a dynamic definition, while "machine learning" is well defined and static i think we crossed the point sometime last year where most of ML is no longer considered AI, …
Mark J. Nelson: true in popular culture but I think a bit different in industry, e.g. most of the medical AI products are basically straightforward ML
Open the thread →