Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,373 searchable experts 3,304 tracked across all sources
Build my stream Create my edition
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Jukan ×
Most important

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Developing AI field signal Signal 2d ago

9b8383b1 a28d 8c4e 2f0cd21556ef

3 experts are actively discussing the implications.

5 experts 1 community 1 sources clustered
Ramon Astudillo Spiros Margaris Rohan Paul Long Lasting Mascot Jukan

“> Mythos 5 has about 8tn parameters and Fable 5 about 5tn. Wait what? Where does this come from? www.ft.com/content/9b83...”

3 experts discussed this · 10 posts
Ramon Astudillo: > Mythos 5 has about 8tn parameters and Fable 5 about 5tn. Wait what? Where does this come from? www.ft.com/content/9b83...
Tim Kellogg: i think it’s officially stated that Fable = Mythos with safeguards, pretty sure they’re binary equivalent
Ramon Astudillo: Yeah, it makes no sense as well. I wonder how Finacial Times got to that statement ... probably LLM hallucination.
Open the full discussion →
Primary source ft.com ↗