Expert attention map

The Who's Who of AI

What credible people across AI noticed, why it matters, and where the field is converging or disagreeing.

2,397 searchable experts 4,280 tracked across all sources
Filter the conversation Who is saying what?

Combine a professional role with a reaction lens. Both must match the same attributed contribution.

Clear all
New Network reaction maps

See how experts are reacting—not just what they shared.

Posts are grouped by conversation and tone. Select a lens to filter the stream; these are never permanent labels on people.

0 live reaction maps in this view

No development in this filter has enough independent reactions yet. The maps appear as soon as the evidence supports them.

Showing signals surfaced by Kate Knibbs ×

The developments commanding sustained expert attention

One card per development. Sources are clustered; reaction bundles describe these posts, never the people behind them.

Established Models & releases Development 5d ago
⚡ 5 h early
Gen AI slop jihad disinformation

Gen AI Tools Are Now Being Used to Push ‘Slop Jihad’

4 experts across 3 network communities independently surfaced this.

4 experts 3 communities 1 sources clustered

“The latest AI innovation: Slop Jihad.”

“Bad content drives out, well, also pretty bad, but in a different way? www.wired.com/story/gen-ai...”

Established Culture, work & education Development 20d ago
⚡ 5 h early
deepfakes targeting teachers

They Dedicated Their Lives to Teaching. Then the Deepfakes Started

3 experts across 2 network communities independently surfaced this.

3 experts 2 communities 1 sources clustered

“Welcoming GenAI into schools continues to be, IMO, an untenable position, unless I suppose your goal is to drive out educators, in which case, the strategy is working as intended.”